At the third bargaining session on March 28, 2016, our bargaining team responded to a number of the administration lawyer’s initial proposals. In our counterproposals, among other issues, we insisted upon the composition of the union as decided before the National Labor Relations Board, we put forward strong language recognizing the union’s right to function on campus, and we reiterated the importance of recognizing the contingent faculty’s fundamental academic freedom rights.

[aps-social id=”1″]